Facing a DWI charge can be overwhelming, especially when the consequences threaten your future. However, understanding that your case may involve unique factors—such as a medical condition, the timing of alcohol absorption, or even errors by law enforcement—can offer hope as one of the defenses against DWI charges. By exploring every angle, you can regain a sense of control. You can take control of your case outcome by implementing the right defense strategy. This proactive approach ensures that the results are not predetermined. Your path to relief begins with understanding your options.
In this article, we will cover:
Medical conditions can significantly affect the accuracy of a DWI charge and provide valid grounds for a defense. For example, dentures can trap alcohol, food particles, or other substances that may be misinterpreted as alcohol during a breathalyzer test. This situation can result in false readings, detecting mouth alcohol instead of blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Understanding this can be crucial in contesting the validity of breathalyzer results.
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is another condition that can cause alcohol from the stomach to enter the breath due to acid reflux. This can result in inflated breathalyzer readings that don’t accurately reflect your true blood alcohol level.
Additionally, factors such as body temperature, gender, and ethnicity can influence breathalyzer results. For instance, breathalyzers are typically calibrated for average body temperatures, but individual variations—such as a fever—may lead to inaccurate readings. Similarly, alcohol metabolism rates differ based on factors like body size and gender, further complicating the accuracy of breath tests.
Because of this, it’s crucial to disclose any relevant medical conditions to your attorney. An experienced DWI attorney can investigate how these factors may have affected your breathalyzer results and use this information to challenge the accuracy of the evidence.
Rising blood alcohol concentration (BAC) serves as a nuanced legal defense in DWI cases. This defense focuses on how your body absorbs alcohol and how your BAC fluctuates over time, which may differ from the BAC recorded during the chemical test. Understanding these differences can be crucial in establishing your defense strategy.
When you consume alcohol, it doesn’t immediately enter your bloodstream. The absorption process can take 20 minutes to an hour or longer, depending on factors such as whether you’ve eaten recently. This defense contends that if you consumed alcohol just before driving, your BAC likely was lower while driving than it was during the chemical test.
For instance, if you had a drink at noon and were stopped by the police at 12:30 p.m., they might conduct a preliminary breath test that shows an elevated BAC. However, in New York and many other states, results from preliminary breath tests at the scene are not admissible in court. If law enforcement tested you at the police station at 1:15 p.m., your BAC might be significantly higher. This increase could result from the additional time it takes for alcohol to fully absorb into your bloodstream.
While the formal test result counts in court, it may not reflect your actual BAC during driving. This defense often relies on retrograde extrapolation. This scientific method estimates your BAC at the time of driving based on later test results. By demonstrating that your BAC was below the legal limit while driving, you can challenge the prosecution’s case effectively. Even if your BAC rose later, this evidence can significantly strengthen your defense. Using this strategy can create reasonable doubt regarding your impairment.
By thoroughly investigating every detail—from medical conditions to the timing of alcohol consumption—your defense strategy can become much stronger, giving you a better chance at a favorable outcome.
Attorney Randall Inniss of The Inniss Firm, PLLC in New York is a highly skilled criminal defense attorney with extensive experience handling complex DWI cases. He has successfully defended countless clients facing serious charges and understands the complexity of DWI law, from challenging breathalyzer results to procedural errors made by law enforcement. His client-focused approach ensures that every defense is meticulously crafted to achieve the best possible outcome.
If you're navigating DWI charges, trust The Inniss Firm to provide the expert guidance and support you need. Contact us today for a complimentary consultation.
Environmental factors can sometimes be used as a defense in a DWI case. For example, if your job regularly exposes you to solvents containing alcohol—such as paint, cleaning products, or other chemicals—this could potentially impact the results of a breathalyzer test.
When you’re around alcohol-based solvents, these substances can end up on your skin, clothes, or hands. If you take a breathalyzer test shortly after exposure, trace amounts of alcohol from these solvents might affect the accuracy of the test. This is particularly relevant if you handle these materials right before the test and some residue remains on your hands as you hold the device.
In such cases, the nature of your job and the environment you work in can be introduced as part of your DWI defense. Your attorney may argue that the alcohol detected by the breathalyzer wasn’t from drinking but rather from external exposure to alcohol-containing solvents.
You can use inaccuracies in a police report as part of your defense in a DWI case. Police officers undergo extensive training to take accurate notes and document events correctly, from their time in the academy through ongoing in-service training. By highlighting these inaccuracies, you can challenge the credibility of the prosecution’s evidence and strengthen your case. It’s essential to scrutinize every detail in the report for potential flaws that could benefit your defense strategy. Their ability to produce an accurate report is paramount, particularly when it comes to cases involving impaired driving.
Errors or inconsistencies in the police report raise questions about the investigation’s handling. For example, if an officer records details incorrectly, it may suggest carelessness in other procedures. This includes the proper administration of a breathalyzer test or field sobriety test during your arrest. Such mistakes can indicate that the investigation lacked the necessary rigor. Highlighting these inconsistencies can be vital for your defense. They may lead to challenges against the evidence presented by the prosecution. It could also indicate outright bias or ill will toward you.
Regardless of the reason behind the inaccuracy, highlighting them means you can argue that the officer’s failure to adhere to their training undermines the reliability of their entire investigation. This can dramatically weaken the prosecution’s case and potentially cast doubt on the evidence collected against you.
Procedural errors by law enforcement can significantly impact a DWI case. Errors often arise from how officers collect evidence, especially with chemical tests like breathalyzers, and whether they followed legal protocols during the arrest process.
One key example is failing to follow the checklist before administering a breathalyzer test. Officers must observe a waiting period of 15 to 20 minutes before conducting the test. This procedure ensures that any residual alcohol does not influence the results.
Additionally, outside factors, such as a police officer’s cell phone, could interfere with the breathalyzer due to radio frequency interference. If these steps aren’t properly followed, the accuracy of the breathalyzer reading can be called into question.
The prosecution may argue that the machine should indicate errors. However, outdated breathalyzer equipment may not reliably detect issues. If procedural errors occur, the defense can challenge the test’s accuracy. This approach can argue for excluding unreliable test results from evidence.
Outside of chemical tests, other procedural errors can also be relevant. If an officer failed to read your Miranda rights on time, it could weaken the case against you. Arrests made without completing required steps may also harm the prosecution’s case. Such errors, whether in evidence collection or procedural steps, can be crucial in a DWI defense.
When building a defense strategy, I focus on creating one that is both comprehensive and multi-faceted. Our initial conversation will cover a wide range of topics—from your occupation and medical history to a detailed timeline of events leading up to your arrest. We’ll explore everything, even hours before the traffic stop, as seemingly minor details could play a crucial role in your defense.
To ensure we gather all relevant information, our firm employs a thorough questionnaire. We also pay close attention to the legality of the traffic stop itself. If the stop was not legally justified, we may be able to challenge it, potentially making any subsequent evidence inadmissible in court.
We carefully review every detail, from your health and employment to the interactions you had with law enforcement. The statements made during the stop and arrest process often reveal critical weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.
Beyond the stop and arrest, we also scrutinize the technical evidence. You should verify the calibration of the breathalyzer, ensure proper maintenance of the equipment, and analyze gas chromatograms to identify any inconsistencies in the readings.
Helping clients navigate the complexities of a DWI case is incredibly rewarding. I understand that every client’s definition of a “positive outcome” may differ, which is why my first step is to listen to what you believe is a successful resolution.
For some, a swift resolution is key, especially if they have pressing personal or professional commitments. My role is to guide you toward the best possible outcome. Sometimes, this requires taking additional time to pursue a more favorable result. I will discuss every aspect of your case with you. This includes the traffic stop and field sobriety tests. I will also provide my legal perspective on what we can realistically achieve. Your case deserves careful attention to detail for the best defense. Together, we can explore all options available to you.
Ultimately, my goal is to align your objectives with my legal analysis, ensuring we balance your needs with a clear, realistic path forward. Together, we’ll work toward a resolution that best meets your expectations.
For more information on Defending Against DWI Charges In New York, a complimentary consultation is your next best step. Get the information and legal answers you are seeking by calling (845) 533-0265 today.
Attorney Randall Inniss of The Inniss Firm, PLLC in New York is a highly skilled criminal defense attorney with extensive experience handling complex DWI cases. He has successfully defended countless clients facing serious charges and understands the complexity of DWI law, from challenging breathalyzer results to procedural errors made by law enforcement. His client-focused approach ensures that every defense is meticulously crafted to achieve the best possible outcome.
If you're navigating DWI charges, trust The Inniss Firm to provide the expert guidance and support you need. Contact us today for a complimentary consultation.
If You Have Been Arrested, Time Is Precious So Don't Delay Or
Wait! Call Us Today At (845) 533-0265
